Sociology Program Presents
"Liberal Law-and-Order"
Thursday, November 5, 2026
Massena Campus - East Wing, Ba Win Hall
5:00 pm – 6:30 pm EST/GMT-5
5:00 pm – 6:30 pm EST/GMT-5
Sebastian Spitz, legal academic and sociologist. (Simon’s Rock A.A. 2014; Bard College B.A. 2017)
Simon's Rock and the Bard Sociology Department cordially invite you to join us for a talk, "Liberal Law-and-Order," by alum Sebastian Spitz in Ba Win Hall on Thursday, November 5 from 5 to 6 pm, followed by an informal reception.
Talk abstract: In this talk, I reconstruct the ideology of liberal law-and-order as it was articulated at its height in the Johnson administration, argue for its empirical viability, and apply it to prison reform. Johnson-era proponents recognized that crime was a grave social problem, disproportionately affecting African-Americans and the poor. The welfare state could be used to address crime's root cause, poverty, but was insufficient on its own; it needed to be supplemented by the penal state. Yet the existing criminal justice system was under-resourced, inefficient, inhumane, and in dire need of reform. I compare this liberal approach to three rival ideologies: abolitionism, conservative law-and-order, and libertarianism. I argue that contemporary social science supports its premises. Finally, I construct a liberal horizon for prison reform: incarceration should be safe, rehabilitative, and rare. I describe what liberal prison reform looks like, and the addressable political-economic barriers—fiscal constraints, a lack of supervisory state capacity, and the Principle of Less Eligibility—that obstruct its realization.
Talk abstract: In this talk, I reconstruct the ideology of liberal law-and-order as it was articulated at its height in the Johnson administration, argue for its empirical viability, and apply it to prison reform. Johnson-era proponents recognized that crime was a grave social problem, disproportionately affecting African-Americans and the poor. The welfare state could be used to address crime's root cause, poverty, but was insufficient on its own; it needed to be supplemented by the penal state. Yet the existing criminal justice system was under-resourced, inefficient, inhumane, and in dire need of reform. I compare this liberal approach to three rival ideologies: abolitionism, conservative law-and-order, and libertarianism. I argue that contemporary social science supports its premises. Finally, I construct a liberal horizon for prison reform: incarceration should be safe, rehabilitative, and rare. I describe what liberal prison reform looks like, and the addressable political-economic barriers—fiscal constraints, a lack of supervisory state capacity, and the Principle of Less Eligibility—that obstruct its realization.
Author bio: Sebastian Spitz (Simon’s Rock A.A. 2014; Bard College B.A. 2017) is a legal academic and sociologist. He is pursuing a Ph.D. at Harvard University’s Sociology Department, and graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. His research focuses on three questions: who commits crime, who gets punished, and how the criminal justice system can fairly and efficiently prevent crime. He uses quantitative methods to look at differential punishment and criminal offending across social categories such as gender, sexual orientation, and race. He has published in the Annual Review of Criminology and the Oxford Handbook of Comparative-Historical Sociology. Sebastian recently completed a clerkship for Judge Lawrence Kahn of the Northern District of New York, and will begin a clerkship for Judge Pierre Leval of the Second Circuit later this year.
Download: SebastianSpitzPoster-1-1.pdf
For more information, call 203-715-5019, or e-mail [email protected].
Time: 5:00 pm – 6:30 pm EST/GMT-5
Location: Massena Campus - East Wing, Ba Win Hall